YouTube is set to turned 20 on 14 February 2025, and it has grown into one of the most influential communication platforms on the planet. With nearly a third of the world’s population logging on every month, YouTube has reshaped entertainment, education, and even political discourse. Yet for all its ubiquity, much of YouTube remains shrouded in mystery. How many videos are on the site? Who is posting them? What languages do they use?
A research team led by Ethan Zuckerman at the University of Massachusetts Amherst took on these questions with an unusual approach: by “drunk dialing” YouTube. In essence, they built a computer program that tries billions of random YouTube URLs to find a truly random sample of videos. Their findings are upending some long-held assumptions about how the platform works—and raising questions about the transparency of one of the internet’s most powerful platforms.
YouTube’s Enormous Scale—and Secrecy
YouTube’s global impact is undeniable:
- It has around 2.5 billion monthly users, many of whom watch it on mobile, desktop, or connected TVs.
- Surveys show YouTube is the most popular social media site in the US, and it’s the second most-visited website in the world, behind only Google itself.

Despite this massive presence, Google (YouTube’s parent company) keeps crucial data points under wraps. We don’t know exactly how many videos exist on YouTube, nor do we know the total amount of content consumed worldwide. Google occasionally shares slivers of data—like the number of hours of video uploaded per minute—but it has never offered a comprehensive look at the platform’s scope.
The Consequences of Opaque Data
Critics argue that this secrecy is a serious problem, given YouTube’s status as a global information hub. Without a clear understanding of the platform’s size, demographics, or content distribution, regulators and researchers are left guessing about how to address issues like misinformation, radicalization, and content moderation.
The “Drunk Dial” Scraper: How It Works
Zuckerman and his colleagues devised a way to generate unbiased insights into YouTube’s scale. They noted that each YouTube video is identified by an 11-character code in its URL. By randomly generating billions of these codes and testing which ones led to actual videos, they built a unique “scraper” that collects a random sampling of YouTube’s content.

- Random URL Generation: The program creates an 11-character alphanumeric string—essentially guessing a valid YouTube address.
- Verification: If the guess corresponds to a real video, the scraper records it. If not, it moves on.
- Data Collection: The team compiles details about each successfully retrieved video, from its language and length to its view count and monetization status.
This approach is akin to repeatedly dialing random phone numbers in a given area code to figure out which lines are active. It’s both innovative and resource-intensive—Zuckerman’s team often had to attempt more than a trillion random codes just to find a few thousand valid videos.
Key Findings: YouTube by the Numbers
1. The Size of YouTube
- Estimated Video Count: In 2022, the team concluded YouTube hosted around 9 billion videos. By mid-2024, that number had grown to nearly 14.8 billion, representing a 60% jump in just a couple of years.

- Exponential Growth: The scraper’s findings highlight that YouTube’s content library grows at a dizzying rate—yet remains unacknowledged officially by Google.
2. Typical View Counts
- Median Views: Surprisingly, the median number of views per video is just 41. This contrasts starkly with the public perception of YouTube as a platform dominated by mega-influencers racking up millions of views.
- Videos with Zero Views: About 4% of the sample had never been watched at all, suggesting a huge long tail of overlooked content.

3. Length and Production Quality
- Short and Unpolished: The median video length is 64 seconds, and over a third of the videos are less than 33 seconds. Many are simple clips with shaky camera work, minimal editing, or just a still image set to music.
- Low Monetization: Only 0.21% of the videos in the sample included monetization, such as sponsorships or in-video ads. Less than 4% explicitly asked viewers to “like, comment, and subscribe,” suggesting that most videos are posted for personal, not commercial, reasons.
4. Language Distribution
- English Dominance, But…: While English remains the most frequent language detected, there’s a vast array of other languages—including Spanish, Hindi, Portuguese, Russian, and more—indicating YouTube’s truly global reach.
- Local Content: Many of the random videos captured are from local communities, official proceedings (like town hall meetings), or personal diaries, reinforcing YouTube’s role as a global repository of varied content.

Rethinking YouTube: Infrastructure vs. Entertainment
Google often positions YouTube as a place for professional creators, big brands, and viral entertainment. But the scraper’s findings suggest that the majority of videos are more personal, low-visibility, and decidedly non-commercial.

An “Internet Repository”
- Utility Over Entertainment: From local government meetings to personal family moments, many users treat YouTube as a storage and distribution platform.
- Public Service: YouTube effectively acts as a free, public broadcasting tool, offering an essential outlet for community groups, civic institutions, and individuals who want to share information or preserve moments.
Calls for Transparency
Because YouTube functions more like digital infrastructure than just a social media platform, researchers argue it should meet higher standards of transparency. Whether it’s clarifying how the recommendation algorithm works or providing statistics about content and viewership, critics say Google’s secrecy hinders informed policymaking and public understanding.
The Regulatory Landscape
Mounting Scrutiny
- Antitrust Cases: Google has faced lawsuits and regulatory challenges worldwide over alleged monopolistic practices. While much attention focuses on Google Search or the Android ecosystem, YouTube’s enormous influence largely flies under the radar.
- Calls for Oversight: Experts like Paul Barrett at New York University note that social media companies—especially those with billions of users—operate at a scale comparable to major industries (like finance or agriculture) but without commensurate regulation.

Balancing Innovation and Accountability
Any push for more disclosure must balance the need for user privacy, proprietary business interests, and the public good. However, researchers argue that a baseline of data—like the number of videos, languages, or basic engagement stats—should be public to facilitate meaningful discourse and policy decisions.
Conclusion: Shining a Light on YouTube’s True Scale
The “drunk dialing” scraper has provided a rare glimpse into YouTube’s hidden world. Its findings challenge the assumption that YouTube is primarily about viral hits and professional creators. Instead, it appears to be a massive, globally accessible video repository—one where most content goes unnoticed, but which plays an essential role for millions of ordinary users.

As YouTube enters its third decade, understanding its full scope becomes increasingly urgent. Whether the platform is used for entertainment, public information, or civic engagement, its scale and reach demand a higher level of transparency. The debate over how to regulate—or even just measure—YouTube is only beginning, and Zuckerman’s research offers a vital starting point.
Key Takeaways
- Enormous, Under-Examined: YouTube may house more than 14 billion videos, with billions more added each year.
- Mostly Non-Commercial: The vast majority of videos see few views and are not monetized, suggesting a platform used more for personal or local purposes than for profit.
- A Critical Public Utility?: Many researchers argue that YouTube’s role as an essential communication tool should come with greater public accountability and data transparency.

What’s your take on YouTube’s evolving role? Should it be treated like a digital public utility, or is it just another private platform? Share your thoughts and join the conversation on how best to ensure accountability for one of the most influential technologies of our time.